The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2013, 09:25 PM   #226
RedskinBronco
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,024
Default

How are the chiefs even in this thread. Chiefs and Super Bowl just don't go together; unless you want to go back to super bowl 4 or whatever it was lol.

Please become a respectable franchise before pumping your chests chef fans.
RedskinBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 09:28 PM   #227
Play2win
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,636

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Duke
Default

Well, we were a 2nd overtime away from being Superbowl champs...
Play2win is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 09:33 PM   #228
SoCalBronco
Nixonite
 
SoCalBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 35,034

Adopt-a-Bronco:
D.J. Williams
Default

Where was Terry Porter when the 49ers needed him?
__________________
SoCalBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 09:33 PM   #229
Crushaholic
Armchair Poster
 
Crushaholic's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 22,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drunk idiot kicker View Post
Well, we were a 2nd overtime away from being Superbowl champs...
Not really. We had to get through New England, first. If the conservative gameplan HAD worked, against the Ravens, it probably WOULDN'T have worked on the Patriots...
Crushaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:01 PM   #230
maher_tyler
Ring of Famer
 
maher_tyler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,048

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Champ Bailey
Default



Best video I could find of the holding in the end zone on that last punt by the Ravens.
maher_tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:04 PM   #231
Play2win
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,636

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Duke
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crushaholic View Post
Not really. We had to get through New England, first. If the conservative gameplan HAD worked, against the Ravens, it probably WOULDN'T have worked on the Patriots...
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Play2win is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:46 PM   #232
Wes Mantooth
Ring of Famer
 
Wes Mantooth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,801
Default

aggghh!!!

http://t.foxsports.msn.com/refs-come...ugh-non-call-1
Wes Mantooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 04:22 AM   #233
go_broncos
Ring of Famer
 
49 SB Champs Denver Broncos

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,778

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Rod Smith
Default

it all started with Replacement officials...Wish this season never happened.
go_broncos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 05:49 AM   #234
2KBack
Rumblin' Bumblin'
 
2KBack's Avatar
 
Cake is delicious

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 7,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maher_tyler View Post


Best video I could find of the holding in the end zone on that last punt by the Ravens.
wouldn't have mattered, the play continues on a hold, and the result would be a safety either way.
2KBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 07:07 AM   #235
That One Guy
Producer of Nonsense
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sun and Beachville
Posts: 14,087

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2KBack View Post
wouldn't have mattered, the play continues on a hold, and the result would be a safety either way.
Exactly. Another interesting loophole in the rule. As long as they held as long as they did (or longer), all they did was guarantee that at least one more play would occur. Even then, an offensive penalty doesn't usually extend a game so I'd be interested to see how that would be called.
That One Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 07:37 AM   #236
Sideburn
Thanks for the memories
 
Sideburn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by That One Guy View Post
Exactly. Another interesting loophole in the rule. As long as they held as long as they did (or longer), all they did was guarantee that at least one more play would occur. Even then, an offensive penalty doesn't usually extend a game so I'd be interested to see how that would be called.
I could be incorrect, and actually probably am. But, If the hold had been called, since the penalty happened on a scoring play, they could have opted to have them enforce the 10 yards on the kick. That extra 10 yards could have made the tee'd up free kick an actual viable outcome. I'm not sure that this is how it would be enforced or if even legal to do so...
__________________

The 2004 Neck Pony Nation / Orangemane Fantasy Football Champion
Sideburn's Evil Head Brigade (14-1)
Sideburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 08:03 AM   #237
That One Guy
Producer of Nonsense
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sun and Beachville
Posts: 14,087

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideburn View Post
I could be incorrect, and actually probably am. But, If the hold had been called, since the penalty happened on a scoring play, they could have opted to have them enforce the 10 yards on the kick. That extra 10 yards could have made the tee'd up free kick an actual viable outcome. I'm not sure that this is how it would be enforced or if even legal to do so...
That would, then, apply to every holding or intentional grounding safety that ever happened, right? I've never seen that called, though.

Also, since it happened in the course of the play, the options would've been to take the penalty (in the endzone so a safety) or the outcome of the play (safety but holding declined) so I don't think you can say they took the holding and the outcome of the play at the same time. I hope that makes sense.
That One Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 09:27 AM   #238
RaiderH8r
In The Bag
 
RaiderH8r's Avatar
 
Don't worry. Nobody's listening.

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Meth Alley
Posts: 10,637

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MethWolfe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by That One Guy View Post
That would, then, apply to every holding or intentional grounding safety that ever happened, right? I've never seen that called, though.

Also, since it happened in the course of the play, the options would've been to take the penalty (in the endzone so a safety) or the outcome of the play (safety but holding declined) so I don't think you can say they took the holding and the outcome of the play at the same time. I hope that makes sense.
Also, would there have been a 10 second runoff on a hold there?
RaiderH8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Denver Broncos