![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,567
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,558
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,567
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
I believe that number includes base salary and bonus allocation per slot in compliance with the new CBA.
I dunno. Im retarDedddd! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Solid Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 189
Adopt-a-Bronco: Knowshon Moreno |
Are you guys just begging for lonestar to join in now?? lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,558
|
Yeah if all six of our players make the team then the full $3,919,615 counts against the cap. Till they do I believe only the signing bonus count against the cap. That means the 6 rookies will take up 1,489,615 against the cap at first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,051
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
Hey Lonestar; This is what I was talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London, ON
Posts: 10,027
Adopt-a-Bronco: Spencer Larsen |
The rookie pool is an addition to the salary cap, it is allocated each year based on which draft picks each team holds and is a way to limit teams from signing rookies to outrageous contracts or from soaking up every undrafted free agent. All rookies, drafted and undrafted must have a total salary cap hit less than the rookie pool alloted for that team.
The rookie pool is not the cap figure. The salary cap during the offseason is calculated as the sum of the salary cap figures of the top 51 earning players on the roster - by the time of the draft all teams should have more than 51 players on the roster each earning at least veteran minimum salary. When the rookies sign their contracts they will bump some of these veterans out of the top 51, so the net cap charge of the signing the rookies is the difference between what the players who got bumped out of the top 51 and the rookies make. On average a veteran makes a minimum of 470k, and if you have 8 rookies who will make more than that, that means that you can subtract 8*470k= 3.8m from the cap before you add on what the rookies make (in this case about 5 million), so the net cap charge is only 1.2 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,150
|
If, as some think possible, The Broncos trade out of the first, does their first pick equal the actual round the player was picked? That could save at least four million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I'm buying
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,218
Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I'm buying
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,218
Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Young Buck
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,219
Adopt-a-Bronco: Thunder (RIP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,567
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
Denver trading down wasn't a big deal -- it was using the ammo they got in the trade down to trade back up which miffed me.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|